Robert Ratcliffe, Deputy Assistant Director of Renewable Resources and Planning for the Bureau of Land Management, welcomed participants to the second day of discussion on the morning of Monday, January 9th. He set the stage for the panel on The Recreation Fee Program Today: Accomplishments and Challenges, which discussed the current recreation fee program, how it is successful and where problems lie. He encouraged panelists to imagine an ideal fee system, but to consider appropriate future alternatives that would best serve the American public. Mr. Ratcliffe asserted that if the Federal Lands Recreation Act (FLREA) sunsets in 2014, fees will still remain. He implored participants to think of ways to improve FLREA in terms of the focus, clarity and transparency of the program.
The first set of speakers was comprised of representatives from the Interagency Fee Working Group. Jane Moore, Fee Program Manager for the National Park Service, was first to speak. She explained the purpose of fees, saying that people who use certain facilities – like outdoor recreation enthusiasts – should help defray some of the cost of running such a site. Ms. Moore showed a video featuring several places in the U.S. where fees have improved recreation sites enormously – and where patrons understand and encourage fee charges. She concluded by telling participants that the members of the Interagency Fee Working Group were participating in Partners Outdoors to be active listeners, take suggestions and listen to critiques of the current fee system.
Anthony Bobo, Acting Deputy Division Chief of Recreation and Visitor Services for the Bureau of Land Management, spoke on lessons learned through the years of the fee program. Mr. Bobo focused on the importance of using fee revenue to enhance the visitor experience. Participating agencies under FLREA keep 80% of fee revenue at the local recreation site. The working group has found that people support and appreciate fees when they can see the benefits of those dollars going back into their local program. Fee revenue should be kept separate from Congressionally appropriated revenue, Mr. Bobo said, but public lands managers should keep in mind that fee revenue stream can be unpredictable and plan accordingly. Mr. Bobo emphasized the importance of working with partner organizations to fully leverage fee income.
Brandon Flint, Acting Fee Program Manager for the U.S. Forest Service and Interagency Pass Program Manager for the National Park Service, expanded on the importance of partnerships. He remarked that the America the Beautiful annual pass has provided partnership opportunities between federal agencies and made significant headway towards improving communication with visitors. The pass is $80 per year and can be accepted at any recreation area managed by the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He pointed out that a major disadvantage to the pass program is that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is unable to participate due to a jurisdictional and budgetary difference in Congress. Passes like the America the Beautiful annual pass also make it easier for federal agencies to use technology to track visitor data – which can result in an improved experience for the visitor. And passes encourage visitors to comply with fees by making the fee payment process simpler. Fee compliance is a big issue, Mr. Flint said, and it is important to make sure everyone who utilizes publicly managed sites pays fairly.
The working group wrapped up their panel with a presentation by Phil LePelch, National Coordinator of the Recreation Fee Program for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Mr. LePelch explained the benefits of the working group, including better communication and cooperation between agencies that manage public lands and better information-sharing techniques. The working group has also developed program consistency and decreased visitor confusion. To date, $2.5 billion has been re-invested into visitor improvements under FLREA and has improved accessibility and safety for visitors.
The next panel presented an alternate point of view, with speakers who laid out disadvantages of the current fee program. Kitty Benzar, President of the Western Slope No-Fee Coalition, spoke first. She asserted that public lands should be managed in a way that is welcoming – that is, without fees. She went on to say that public-private partnerships can be problematic because American taxpayers own public lands and trust their stewardship to agencies. Ms. Benzar said that a partnership between a federal agency and a private organization should maintain the agency as the senior associate in the partnership in order to keep the American public’s best interests under consideration. She asserted that this is not always the case. She criticized what she sees as growing commercialization of public lands. Visiting public lands has turned into a marketing transaction, said Ms. Benzar, and fees on these areas drive away the visitors who love them. She called for agencies to stand up for the public and be responsible for the public lands.
Warren Meyer, President of the National Forest Recreation Association, discussed how to implement fee programs that meet the needs of both public land visitors and public land agencies. Agencies can save a tremendous amount of money by allowing private organizations to operate public land sites, but he noted that federal agencies need to provide clear and transparent actions for this to be effective. He pointed out that many recreation budgets are being cut at the federal, state and local levels, and used California as an example of a state where simply having a fee program is insufficient to maintain operation. Many parks and recreation areas in California charge high fees, but these fees are not enough to maintain the program.
Mary Coulombe, Chief of Natural Resources Management for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, addressed challenges in the current fee structure. The largest problem for the Corps is that the agency cannot participate in FLREA due to structural budgetary differences. The Corps hosts seven million recreation visits per year – the highest visitation of any federal agency – and collects about $45 million per year in recreation fees, which all return to the Treasury. Ms. Coulombe and the Corps would like to see those fee dollars stay at local recreation sites to improve facilities. And visitors to Corps sites expect their fees to do just that. When visitors find out that their fee dollars are returned to the Treasury instead of being reinvested in local sites, they’re annoyed, said Ms. Coulombe. And visitors are confused that the Corps cannot take part in recreation-wide programs like the America the Beautiful annual pass. Ms. Coulombe stated that the Corps will need to close parks next year if these challenges are not addressed because its current budget cannot support the current recreation program. The Corps may be the leading federal recreation provider, she explained, but its operational inconsistencies are difficult for the public and will compromise the agency’s future as a provider of quality recreation.
Follow this link to view the collective presentations of Anthony Bobo, Brandon Flint, Phil LePelch, and Jane Moore. Download Recreation Fee Program Today, Bobo, Flint, LePelch, Moore
Follow this link to view Mr. Meyer's presentation. Download Warren Meyer partners outdoors 2012
(Note: Presentations will not load in Internet Explorer.)